Immutable distros are bad

A common sighting in today's linuxy world are immutable distros. If thou knowest not, an immutable distro is a distro, where the system is not managed by the user, but rather by the corporation behind the system. The user has no right to modify the system in any way, every software installed is containerised, and updates are images of the whole system that will just get flashed onto thy computer.

That soundeth a lot like the dystopia Android is, right? Because it is.

The first thing is user's freedom. They just think that users are utter morons. When something worketh not, I just hop into the filesystem, and modify it. For example, today while trying to install chromium I dumped a whole bunch of 64-bit libraries onto my 32-bit system, and several days ago I installed a completely different kernel that ended up not working at all.

Were those things stupid? Absolutely! Should I be allowed to do that? Of course!

If I own a computer, I should be able to do whatever I want thereon.

Even if one wanteth to 'rm -rf /*', he should be able to!

Another thing is that immutable distros are not internet-proof. On such a distro thou needest internet for everything, otherwise the system will not be functional. Thou canst not just install a flatpak/snap package from a DVD. It worketh not this way.

Concluding, I am very disappointed by the fact that so many people like being treated like complete brainless idiots. Immutable distros, afuera!